Airbus Takes
Position Against Boeing


In a scene reminiscent of the American television program "Point-Counterpoint,"
the Airbus Industrie press conference followed one conducted by Boeing.
While neither side engaged in acrimony, friendly references to each other
were not the order of the day. Speakers at both press meetings made reference
to last September's Farnborough conferences, where the floor collapsed during
Boeing's conference leading to the postponement of Airbus'.
Airbus
managing director Jean Pierson started the conference by discussing the
changes affecting the aerospace industry. As proof, he described four factors.
First is the movement toward consolidation in every industry, including
aerospace. Second, said Pierson, is the brutality of competition, citing
the demise of Fokker as an example. As a side note, he observed that Fokker
had elected to go it alone, rather than join with other manufacturers. Pierson
pointed out that the third factor was the reality that a number of countries
now have aspirations to create indigenous aerospace industries. He observed
that these efforts will not be accomplished in isolation. And, lastly, he
pointed to the political and economic forces facing the world, using the
single European currency as one example. All of these things are leading
to a revision in the rules for international trade.
Never one to mince words, the colorful Airbus executive quickly jumped
on the proposed Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger. "This is an attempt
by an already dominant player to force Europe to remain a marginal player.
It is the germ of an attempt to monopolize the aerospace industry."
The broadsides were just starting. Pierson stated that the philosophy
of Airbus is open comptition, adding, "this is contrary to exclusivity."
The Airbus position is that exclusive deals are illegal in Europe, "and
absolutely contrary to European legislation," citing Article 85 and
Article 86 orf the Treaty of Rome. Sliding under his halo for a moment,
Pierson added, "When we are operating in any country, we follow the
laws of the country."
Airbus doesn't plan to take a passive role during the coming months.
"We will apply all legal and neessary actions against the Boeing-McDonnell
Douglas merger, or Europe will have to change the law," said Pierson.
And, that may extend to the airlines with which Boeing has forged long-term
relationships. "These three airlines [American, Continental and Delta]
operate in Europe and are subject to European law," said Pierson.
Exclusive deals create two big problems, he went on to say. The first
is they lock up the market, locking out competition. The second is, they
stop the aircraft development progress.
The real duration of a 20-year exclusive deal, explained Pierson, is
that it is not 20-year exclusivity - it's really 35-45 years. Further, the
average life of a commercial aircaft is 35-45 years. Taking a nominal timeframe
of 30 years through the life of the aircraft, "these exclusive deals
are not for 20 years, but for eternity," he said with characteristic
passion.
As he concluded his remarks, Pierson's wrap up statement seemed almost
a rallying cry to the forces against evil. "Our past record has been
a result of the heat of competition and that will be the rule for the new
world order."
Okay, Jean, but don't hold anything back now, please.
In fact, Jean Pierson shared his personal opinion on the proposed Boeing
- McDonnell Douglas merger for AeroWorldNet readers in a related
article.
Paris Daily Cover
Page | Contact AeroWorldNet
 |